Ocasio-Cortez to Crenshaw: ‘Why on earth’ would you lend your handgun to mates? | TheHill

1

Bag. Alexandria Ocasio-CortezAlexandria Ocasio-CortezOcasio-Cortez to Crenshaw: ‘Why on earth’ would you lend your handgun to mates? Buttigieg would use Protection Department to fight climate change Ocasio-Cortez tweets video of harm prompted by Dorian: ‘This is what climate change looks cherish’ MORE (D-N.Y.) on Wednesday lashed out at Republican colleague Bag. Dan CrenshawDaniel CrenshawOcasio-Cortez to Crenshaw: ‘Why on earth’ would you lend your handgun to mates? The red flag fallacy: Why must politicians obtain to elaborate ‘sanity’? Red flag laws gained’t pause mass shootings — ending gun-free zones will MORE (Texas) after he complained that normal background tests would prevent him from lending his handgun to his mates.

“You’re a member of Congress. Why are you ‘lending’ guns to folks unsupervised who can’t pass a total background take a look at?” the progressive firebrand wrote on Twitter.

“The folks you’re giving a gun to acquire doubtless abused their associate or obtain a violent criminal file, & you would no longer are conscious of it. Why on earth would you make that?”

You’re a member of Congress. Why are you “lending” guns to folks unsupervised who can’t pass a total background take a look at?

The folks you’re giving a gun to acquire doubtless abused their associate or obtain a violent criminal file, & you would no longer are conscious of it.

Why on earth would you make that? https://t.co/TQFjcLQebO

— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) September 4, 2019

The Texas Republican fired abet, telling Ocasio-Cortez that American citizens “outside NYC” lend guns to their mates for “self-protection and attempting capabilities.” 

“True so I’m obvious: you have faith you studied my mates are home abusers/criminals? Severely that’s your argument? That they will’t pass a background take a look at?” Crenshaw asked.

True so I’m obvious: you have faith you studied my mates are home abusers/criminals? Severely that’s your argument? That they will’t pass a background take a look at?

Negative. Of us lend guns to mates, esp within the event that they don’t contain a gun, for self-protection and attempting capabilities.

This is The US outside NYC. https://t.co/wkWPhfi0JB

— Dan Crenshaw (@DanCrenshawTX) September 4, 2019

Ocasio-Cortez noteworthy that if a standard background take a look at would “be a local” to Crenshaw rapidly giving a weapon to his friend, “then you positively shouldn’t ‘lend’ a gun.” 

“And btw, NY is one amongst the safest states within the nation when it involves guns, incl rural areas,” Ocasio-Cortez wrote. “Are attempting to support up.”

You stated w/ normal background tests, you wouldn’t be in a pickle to “lend” guns to mates.

If a background take a look at would possibly possibly presumably be a local, then you positively shouldn’t “lend” a gun.

And btw, NY is one amongst the safest states within the nation when it involves guns, incl rural areas.

Are attempting to support up. https://t.co/4RV4DNg7FM

— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) September 4, 2019

The Recent York Democrat went on so that you just can add that cases of home abuse are in most cases hidden from shut mates and family. 

“You would possibly possibly perhaps presumably know an abuser & make no longer obtain any clue,” Ocasio-Cortez wrote to Crenshaw. “I’ve had mates come out to me as victims. It’s no longer glaring. Unsafe relationships are COMMON.” 

Ocasio-Cortez used to be responding to Crenshaw’s criticism per a yarn that a young lady outmoded a handgun to protect herself against 5 alleged robbers.

Crenshaw stated that the young lady’s scenario used to be a motive he helps the 2nd Amendment and went on to narrate that normal background tests would create it complex for him to lend is handgun to mates “when they shuttle alone.”

“Scenarios cherish this yarn are why we protect the 2nd Amendment,” Crenshaw wrote. “Side show: With normal background tests, I wouldn’t be in a pickle to let my mates borrow my handgun when they shuttle alone cherish this. We would possibly possibly presumably perhaps create felons out of folks correct for defending themselves.”

Scenarios cherish this yarn are why we protect the 2nd Amendment.

Side show: With normal background tests, I wouldn’t be in a pickle to let my mates borrow my handgun when they shuttle alone cherish this. We would possibly possibly presumably perhaps create felons out of folks correct for defending themselves. https://t.co/x60mdd1WW1

— Dan Crenshaw (@DanCrenshawTX) September 3, 2019

Command laws on the lending of guns vary, but federal law enables it if the recipient is rarely any longer prohibited from possessing a firearm.

U.S. Code does, nevertheless, consist of conditions to dam someone from selling or transferring any firearm or ammunition “shiny or having cheap motive to accept as true with” the recipient is convicted of misdemeanor home violence or is arena to a restraining issue for harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate associate or child.

It also states that it is illegitimate to sell or in any other case eliminate weapons or firearms if the recipient is an illegal person of any controlled substance, has been committed to any mental institution, is within the nation illegally or has been dishonorably discharged from the militia.

The Bipartisan Background Assessments Act of 2019, which passed within the Home abet in February, would restrict most person-to-person firearms transfers with out a background take a look at. The language within the invoice is an strive to shut a doubtless loophole on non-public sales, cherish those at gun reveals, on the on-line or thru classified ads.

It would ban the transfer of firearms between non-public occasions except a licensed gun vendor, manufacturer, or importer has first performed a background take a look at.

The legislation states that it would possibly possibly perhaps presumably no longer apply to obvious firearm transfers, such as a present between spouses.

The Republican-controlled Senate has but to vote on the invoice.

Senate Majority Chief Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellOcasio-Cortez to Crenshaw: ‘Why on earth’ would you lend your handgun to mates? Washington Post editorial lists mass shooting victims in call for McConnell to ‘make one thing’ The Hill’s Morning Record – Storm Dorian devastates the Bahamas, creeps along Florida fly MORE (R-Ky.) on Tuesday pressured that President TrumpDonald John TrumpJoe Biden’s file – no longer his gaffes – is dooming his marketing campaign Trump defends shift of FEMA funds, citing Dorian’s change in course Ryan Reynolds, Blake Active donate M to abet migrant kids, social justice MORE‘s give a take to is the foremost to a gun reform invoice getting a vote within the higher chamber, asserting the administration “is within the technique of discovering out what they’re ready to present a take to, if anything.”

“I set apart an explain to to acquire an resolution to that subsequent week,” McConnell stated. “If the president is in desire of a call of things that he has discussed overtly and publicly and I know that if we pass it, this would possibly possibly presumably become law, I will set apart it on the bottom.”

Trump has now and then looked originate to expanding background tests. But he’s also thrown out solutions on mental health and “red flag” laws, which shall be supposed to create it more uncomplicated for law enforcement to rapidly block somebody from owning a gun.